| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |

Tia Lee
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2015.04.21 18:48:52 -
[1] - Quote
My two cents; Undoubtedly t3 dessies **** over frig balance as a whole. Af's have been made completely redundant but basically all frigs have been hit in the face since t3 dessies excell at everything. The worst decision though was to give them superior speed. Given the abundance of slots base speed is much too high even with the slight nerf. Right know t3 desseis are just super frigs which dominate the current meta. On top of that they are cheaper than pirate frigs and dictors even. A slightly larger sig is just not enough to balance absolute superior projection, dps, tank on top of frig speed.
What needs to change: T3 dessies should remain dessies and therefore be SLOW. Slower than af's and certainly slower than dictors. Since they will still be insanely powerful they should also be expensive. CCP should aim for a 70m picetag. |

Tia Lee
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2015.04.21 19:22:25 -
[2] - Quote
dictors are also completely overshadowed by the d3's. they should be better at the kiting and projection thingy. dictors should behave like hacs and t3 dessies should behave like t3 cruiser when it comes to kiting. if things stay that way eve pvp will become much more boring an onedimensional . not good. |

Tia Lee
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2015.04.22 01:34:48 -
[3] - Quote
you people have no idea of balance or of what makes a game fun. It's like watching toddlers playing soccer. |

Tia Lee
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2015.04.22 02:01:36 -
[4] - Quote
Diversity and complexity make eve fun. To ensure diversity and complexity ships must have carefully balanced strenghts and weaknesses. T3 destroyers combinefar too many strenghts of other ships classes with almost no weaknesses. Hence the diversity and complexity provided by tiercide (which was great) turns into svipuls online.
Even T3 cruisers -which are comparable in being the jack of all trades- are inferior to their hac and recon cruiser relatives and still CCP had to balance them with astronomical costs and a horrible sp loss mechanic. T3 dessies combine even more advantages in the frig and dessie world than t3's in the world of cruisers but they are dirt cheap. The current nerf doesn't go nearly far enough. T3 dessies need a real weakness to make up for theirs cruiser dps, tank and projection with small weapon application. Since they are dessies these weaknesses should be speed and sig imo. |

Tia Lee
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2015.04.22 02:12:56 -
[5] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote: On top of that speed, i was able to fit a MASB as tank. Very rarely did i use it, because it was not common to even get hit. Which is more tank than the arty wolf, and about the same as arty jag. Using titanium sabot allowed me to do about 190 dps, the wolf using short range, high damage ammo does about 212 dps. To get the same projection as the svipul means it only does about 142dps. Just for reference, with short range ammo, the svipul did 290dps, and could project it well, out to about 25km.
So yes, the Svipul is better in every way that matters when compared to their AF counterparts, they are OP against an entire class of ships, effectively obsoleting them. 2/10 for spin effort though, needs more spin.
not to mention cap stabilty with point running and insane agility. They obsolete much more than an entire class of ships. Dictors lose their realtive combat usefulness aswell and that's just the tip of the iceberg. Casuals will still jump into frigs but serious pvpers will feel the need to fly the same ship over and over again since everything else is less effective. CCP doesn't want to lose this type of player to a boring meta. Not good. |

Tia Lee
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2015.04.22 11:58:12 -
[6] - Quote
Mayhaw Morgan wrote: I understand you don't like that tactical destroyers are ungodly fast in propulsion mode, but how slow are they supposed to be? (Not a rhetorical question.) So slow that a Tornado warps in at 50km and alphas them off the field before they can respond? So slow that something like a Garmur kites them and pecks them to death? So slow that they cannot even defend themselves from the action they are supposed to defend others from? That doesn't make sense. Unfortunately, in order to react and destroy fast, assaulting ships, they have to be fast themselves.
So, it sounds like these frigates are having trouble with Svipuls conducting fast assaults and destroying them. I sympathize. Being assaulted by really fast ships that do a lot of precision damage sucks, but can you think of some natural counters to that? Hint: Ctrl+Click -> Approach -> Activate Modules is not gonna cut it.
Adapt or die.
I know it must be hard to comprehend but when some people talk about game balance they don't talk about themselves losing to svipuls or losing their favorite toy. I'm flying confessors and svipuls since they were introduced and i had roughly 200 solo kill with them. I killed small gangs, hacs and stuff i shouldn't be able to kill in a brawling dessie hull. I know from first hand experience that right know and even with the upcoming nerf it's not worth flying anything else. Svipuls should die to bigger hulls, it's their intended weakness. dessies one strenght always has been dps. They could get lowish cruiser dps on squishy hulls except t3 dessies hulls are far from squishy. They got cruiser tanks which in combination with frig speed and their still small sig amd abundance of slots makes them insanely powerful against cruiser and bc hulls on top of their ABSOLUTE TACTICAL SUPERIORITY in the world of frigs. This is highly ironic since well balanced t3 dessies could have had the potential to bring more cruisers into the current frig meta but now there is even less reason flying them.
The obvious solution would be to make t3 dessies dessies again: Kind of slow and kind of squishy. More specialized dictors should be kind of better slightly at kiting (speed, projection) and af's should be faster aswell. Even in speed mode. I just hope CCP realizes that now and not after a year of svipuls online.
|

Tia Lee
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2015.04.22 12:12:31 -
[7] - Quote
Mayhaw Morgan wrote: Assault frigates are fast, with excellent tank, and good damage projection. What are THEIR weaknesses? Interceptors are really fast, with small signatures and good resistances (i.e. tank), and with their mobility, they can use range dictation to control how much damage you do to them and how much damage they do to you (i.e. damage projection). What are THEIR weaknesses? Faction frigates combine the various qualities of speed, tank, and damage (and other qualities), but generally speaking, they have two of the three in spades. What are THEIR weaknesses?
What if frigates were the problem?
The fact that you are asking these questions shows that you have no clue when it comes to balancing
Af's are not fast as you stated but slow. Infact they are by far the slowest frigs -even slower than Attack cruisers in some cases. That is their balancing trait.
Pirate frigs on the other hand have tiny tanks. That is their balancing trait.
Now what's the balancing trait of T3 dessies? See?
|

Tia Lee
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2015.04.22 21:21:37 -
[8] - Quote
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
So, on the one hand, the Svipul's speed tank is overpowered, but on the other hand, a pirate frigate's speed tank, which is as fast or faster than a Svipul, is no problem.
I'll ask again: What if frigates were the problem?
I sincerely hope that you are either trolling or that you are just fighting tooth and nail to farm kills until everybody is sick of the t3d meta and quits eve. Whatever it may be, i won't entangle myself in a discussion with you since you are obviously either unwlling or unable to respond rationally.
Anyway, the level of idiocy in this thread has reached a new high. I'm not used to this anymore
Basically it comes down to this: Some people will just be happy with an op ship aslong as they can kill the occasional noob who doesn't fly one. Some people on the other hand like balance and variety and interesting gameplay. The latter doesn't like t3 dessies in their current form. They make EVE a worse game. It's as simple as that.
|

Tia Lee
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2015.04.22 21:25:34 -
[9] - Quote
Orob Ninebands wrote:What a bunch of whiners! Most ships can fit an AB one size larger, why shouldn't a T3D?
I've gotten my but kicked by T3Ds plenty, but rather than cry about it, I learned to fly them myself. Come up with a counter folks.
I'm not opposed to making them cost a bit more to reflect their capability, but ffs, do we have to nerf every good thing just because people can't adapt?
lmao |

Tia Lee
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2015.04.22 22:50:35 -
[10] - Quote
Ivarr Kerensky wrote:Orob Ninebands wrote:What a bunch of whiners! Most ships can fit an AB one size larger, why shouldn't a T3D?
I've gotten my but kicked by T3Ds plenty, but rather than cry about it, I learned to fly them myself. Come up with a counter folks.
I'm not opposed to making them cost a bit more to reflect their capability, but ffs, do we have to nerf every good thing just because people can't adapt?
So your idea of adapting is to fly them yourself, and now that you do you don't want them changed because :reasons:.
stop it! he learned to fly them HIMSELF!11 sneaky, adaptable pvper he is. IMHO all the folks who say that t3 dessies are op and create a boring meta are just not smart enough to fly them themselves!
Adapt or die!!!11 :D
|

Tia Lee
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2015.04.23 13:44:59 -
[11] - Quote
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:Stitch Kaneland wrote:The jag and wolf are better than the rifter because they're focused in a role and because the wolf has an extra turret and a double damage bonus. It also has more slots, longer targeting range, way more base HP, stronger sensor strength, smaller signature radius, more scan resolution, a larger cargohold (lol) etc., etc., etc. It's pretty much better in every way than a Rifter. Stitch Kaneland wrote:you immediately assume that if something is t2 or t3, it should automatically be better than other ships. Thats not how EVE works cupcake. Please stop.
are you seriously still posting? You have proven that you are absolutely cluesless when it comes to game balance whatsoever. You know, the thingy t3d's and atm especially the svipul are messing with. Your whole notion that t3 should outclass t2 in all areas because they have "better technology" (LOL) is so incredibly stupid that one doesn't even know where to start. How can you not comprhend what has been written in this thread?! Anyway: Stop posting you ridiculous statements on how t3d's are fine because they can be killed by bs's and gangs with e-war support according to your "minmatar ship expert" (LOL). Statements like these may be be funny when you first read them but they also make my brain hurt. Like srsly |
| |
|